ERDMAN AVE EB over I-895


+39.30000, -76.54833
39°17'60" N, 76°32'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:ERDMAN AVE EB over I-895
Structure number:300000BCY133013
Location:MILEPOST M13.3
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Total length:181.1 ft. [55.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,790 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.3 tons [51.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,417,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201474.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11790
May 201271.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
April 201071.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
March 200971.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
May 200873.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
March 200773.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
February 200673.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
February 200573.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
March 200473.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
March 200373.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
April 200273.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40950
April 200175.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory28574
April 200075.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory28574
March 199875.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory28574
March 199673.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory28574
February 199474.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood28574
January 199274.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood28574