MILFORD ST over GRAND LAKE STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+45.17889, -67.7761145°10'44" N, 67°46'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MILFORD ST over GRAND LAKE STREAM |
| Structure number: | 3584 |
| Location: | 6.8 MI W PASSAMAQUODDY TL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1939 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 340 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.7 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $130,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 583 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 13.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $636,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 522 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.5 tons [21.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $145,000 |
Comments
MILFORD ST over GRAND LAKE STREAM (Washington County, Maine)
Posted June 9, 2011, by Tim Cox (oldduc [at] comcast [dot] net)
This bridge was replaced with new 1.7 million dollar bridge in 2010. The new bridge is open and fully operational...so no longer on the "ugly bridge" list...just an update