Share:

I-94WB RMP TO M-10 over I-94 EB & M-10 NB

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.35906, -83.07603
42°21'33" N, 83°04'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-94WB RMP TO M-10 over I-94 EB & M-10 NB
Structure number:000000000011194
Old structure number:82182023000S260 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT RAMP F-C
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Total length:1158.2 ft. [353.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.7 ft. [11.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,600 [as of 1995]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.2 tons [72.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.7 tons [43.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201482.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10600
October 201282.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10600
October 201082.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10600
August 200883.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10600
August 200683.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10600
August 200483.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair10600
August 200283.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair10600
August 200095.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10600
July 199895.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10600
October 199545.6Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious7440
July 199466.1Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor7440
December 199366.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodPoor7440
June 199263.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodPoor7440
May 199084.3Not deficientFairGoodFair7440