M-85 over ROUGE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.29140, -83.1421242°17'29" N, 83°08'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | M-85 over ROUGE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 82182071000B040 |
| Location: | IN DETROIT 10400 FORT ST |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 164.1 ft. [50.0 m] |
| Total length: | 281.8 ft. [85.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 55.8 ft. [17.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 73.8 ft. [22.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1926 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
| Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,722 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place but re-evaluation of design suggested [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 37.2 tons [33.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.2 tons [20.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $35,800,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,700 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 53.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,700 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Operating rating: | 81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,739,000 |