M-85 (FORT ST,) over M-10


+42.32714, -83.05569
42°19'38" N, 83°03'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:M-85 (FORT ST,) over M-10
Structure number:000000000011397
Old structure number:82182111000S110 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Total length:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:72.5 ft. [22.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:101.4 ft. [30.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,191 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:32% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:86.5 tons [78.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.8 tons [47.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201581.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair10191
November 201365.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor10191
June 201265.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor10191
July 201081.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair10191
July 200891.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory10191
July 200691.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory10357
July 200491.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14900
July 200291.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14900
July 200091.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14900
August 199891.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14900
June 199691.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentSatisfactory14900
June 199388.0Structurally deficientCriticalGoodSatisfactory14900
May 199288.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodSatisfactory14900
March 199078.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodFair14900