Share:

PALLISTER AVENUE over M-10

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.37021, -83.08402
42°22'13" N, 83°05'02" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PALLISTER AVENUE over M-10
Structure number:000000000011428
Old structure number:82182112000S030 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:69.2 ft. [21.1 m]
Total length:138.5 ft. [42.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:50.2 ft. [15.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,660 [as of 1978]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:78.1 tons [71.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.6 tons [42.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.3
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$38,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201475.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory8660
September 201275.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory8660
September 201075.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood8660
October 200875.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8660
October 200675.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood8660
October 200475.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8660
October 200275.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood8660
November 200064.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairGood8660
September 199925.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactorySerious8660
November 199825.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactorySerious8660
May 199743.8Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryPoor8660
June 199643.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor8660
July 199462.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8660
July 199362.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8660
September 199262.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8660
August 199062.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8660