Share:

CHICAGO BLVD over M-10

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.38241, -83.09525
42°22'57" N, 83°05'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHICAGO BLVD over M-10
Structure number:000000000011433
Old structure number:82182112000S080 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:73.8 ft. [22.5 m]
Total length:225.1 ft. [68.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:93.8 ft. [28.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:117.8 ft. [35.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,000 [as of 1993]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:75.4 tons [68.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.3 tons [41.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201593.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14000
April 201393.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
April 201193.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
May 200893.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
May 200693.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
May 200493.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
May 200293.9Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood14000
May 200093.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood14000
August 199893.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good14000
June 199693.9Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good14000
August 199493.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory14000
June 199261.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair17540
April 199176.6Structurally deficientSeriousGoodFair17540