Share:

I96WB TO I94WB RMP over I-96 & RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.35030, -83.09908
42°21'01" N, 83°05'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I96WB TO I94WB RMP over I-96 & RAMP
Structure number:000000000011590
Old structure number:82182123000S420 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Total length:756.9 ft. [230.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2005
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,290 [as of 1982]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.6 tons [65.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$455,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201594.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6290
October 201394.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6290
October 201194.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood6290
October 200994.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood6290
August 200793.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood6290
August 200593.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood6290
November 200432.0Not deficientPoorSatisfactoryCritical6290
June 200334.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryCritical6290
September 200234.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryCritical6290
December 200134.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryCritical6290
August 200037.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical6290
July 199979.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair6290
November 199835.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical6290
September 199735.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical6290
June 199581.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair6290
October 199381.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair6290
June 199182.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair6290