Share:

ML KING JR BLVD over I-96

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.33622, -83.09077
42°20'10" N, 83°05'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ML KING JR BLVD over I-96
Structure number:000000000011608
Old structure number:82182124000S030 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:173.9 ft. [53.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:93.8 ft. [28.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,500 [as of 1988]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.2 tons [62.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.4 tons [37.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201593.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16500
October 201382.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16500
October 201182.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16500
October 200982.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16500
September 200882.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16500
September 200682.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16500
September 200484.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood16500
July 200281.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16500
July 200082.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16500
December 199882.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16500
October 199682.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16500
May 199482.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good15000
August 199320.8Structurally deficientSeriousPoorCritical15000
November 199220.8Structurally deficientSeriousPoorCritical15000
March 199120.8Structurally deficientSeriousPoorCritical15000