Share:

W CHICAGO AVE over M-39

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.36529, -83.21655
42°21'55" N, 83°12'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:W CHICAGO AVE over M-39
Structure number:000000000011692
Old structure number:82182192000S140 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Total length:108.6 ft. [33.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,200 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.4 tons [58.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.6 tons [35.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201593.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7200
January 201493.9Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good7200
January 201293.6Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good9368
June 201189.6Not deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory9368
June 200989.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory9368
July 200789.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory9368
July 200589.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory9368
July 200389.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood9368
August 200189.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood9368
June 200089.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood9368
July 199889.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood9368
July 199691.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood9368
August 199491.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood9368
August 199291.5Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood9368
July 199091.5Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood9368