Share:

FENKELL AVE over M-39

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.40113, -83.21837
42°24'04" N, 83°13'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FENKELL AVE over M-39
Structure number:000000000011706
Old structure number:82182193000S030 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Total length:108.6 ft. [33.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:89.2 ft. [27.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:99.1 ft. [30.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,000 [as of 1978]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.3 tons [34.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:84.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201584.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good25000
November 201384.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good25000
December 201184.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good25000
June 201148.1Not deficientSeriousFairPoor25000
November 200971.3Structurally deficientSeriousFairSatisfactory25000
July 200785.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory25000
July 200585.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory25000
July 200385.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory25000
August 200185.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory25000
June 200085.1Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodSatisfactory25000
July 199887.2Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodSatisfactory25000
July 199690.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory25000
August 199490.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory25000
June 199290.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory25000
May 199090.0Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodSatisfactory25000