Share:

WATERMAN AVE over I-75

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.30541, -83.10900
42°18'19" N, 83°06'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WATERMAN AVE over I-75
Structure number:000000000011737
Old structure number:82182194000S090 (from 1992 edition)
Location:IN DETROIT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:77.8 ft. [23.7 m]
Total length:310.1 ft. [94.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:70.2 ft. [21.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,772 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.0 tons [82.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.0 tons [43.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:63.6
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201563.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood1772
June 201363.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood1772
June 201163.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood3500
April 200863.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood3500
April 200663.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood3500
April 200474.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
April 200274.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
May 200074.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3500
July 199876.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3500
September 199665.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood3500
August 199476.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good3500
June 199276.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactoryVery Good3500
April 199145.6Structurally deficientSeriousPoorVery Good3500