BRUSH ST over I-75


+42.34197, -83.04877
42°20'31" N, 83°02'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:BRUSH ST over I-75
Structure number:000000000011782
Old structure number:82182195000S270 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:202.8 ft. [61.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,743 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.0 tons [89.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.0 tons [38.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201574.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1743
November 201374.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1743
November 201173.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7620
November 200962.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair7620
May 200848.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor7620
May 200671.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7620
May 200471.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7620
May 200269.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory7620
May 200069.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory7620
August 199869.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood7620
August 199675.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7620
August 199444.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorVery Good7620
July 199244.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorVery Good7620
June 199044.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorVery Good7620