+44.98443, -93.25670
44°59'04" N, 93°15'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:TH 65 (3ED AVE S) over MISS RVR, CITY ST
Structure number:2440
Location:0.3 MI NE OF JCT TH 952A
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:236.6 ft. [72.1 m]
Total length:1887.9 ft. [575.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:58.7 ft. [17.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1917
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,500 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:62.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,500,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201462.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor15500
October 201279.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
September 201079.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
August 200880.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
November 200780.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
July 200680.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
May 200580.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15500
September 200479.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair18500
August 200391.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18500
September 200260.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair14600
July 200160.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair14600
July 200061.7Structurally deficientFairPoorFair14600
October 19990.0Not applicableFairPoorFair2100
June 199861.7Structurally deficientFairPoorFair14600
June 199761.8Structurally deficientFairPoorFair14600
September 199661.8Structurally deficientFairPoorFair14600
July 199559.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory18300
July 199459.9Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory17000
May 199359.9Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory17000
August 199259.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory18600
July 199259.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood18600