Share:

BURNHAM ROAD over CEDAR LK CHANNEL

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.95616, -93.31773
44°57'22" N, 93°19'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BURNHAM ROAD over CEDAR LK CHANNEL
Structure number:27508
Location:0.2 MI NE OF CEDAR LK RD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Total length:63.7 ft. [19.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,081 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:99.2 tons [90.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.7 tons [54.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:98.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201598.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood1081
July 201486.9Not deficientFairFairFair1081
July 201386.9Not deficientFairFairFair1081
August 201288.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair938
July 201188.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair938
September 201088.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair938
July 200986.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair938
August 200886.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair938
June 200799.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
July 200698.9Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory1200
July 200598.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1200
July 200498.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1200
September 200398.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1200
September 200298.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
September 200198.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
August 200097.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
200097.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
July 199897.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
July 199782.1Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
September 199682.1Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1100
August 199589.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1130
August 199489.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1705
September 199389.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood1705
September 199291.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood1280