TH 62 over 28th Ave S


+44.89739, -93.23239
44°53'51" N, 93°13'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:TH 62 over 28th Ave S
Structure number:27521
Location:0.7 MI E OF JCT TH 77
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:67.6 ft. [20.6 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:59.7 ft. [18.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.6 ft. [20.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:63,000 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.6 tons [52.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.5 tons [31.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:90.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$612,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201490.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood63000
August 201290.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood63000
September 201090.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood63000
October 200891.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood63000
November 200791.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood63000
June 200691.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood63000
August 200591.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood63000
June 200391.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood55000
November 200191.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood56000
December 200092.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56000
November 199992.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56000
June 199892.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood56000
October 199691.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood56000
October 199587.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood37000
October 199487.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood47500
May 199389.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood47500
August 199289.2Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good47500
July 199183.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good47500