Share:

I 94 E Frontage Rd over Lyndale Avenue NB

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.97203, -93.28737
44°58'19" N, 93°17'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I 94 E Frontage Rd over Lyndale Avenue NB
Structure number:27799L
Location:0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 394
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:508.6 ft. [155.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,500 [as of 1994]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.5 tons [65.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.7 tons [38.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$480,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201577.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood10500
September 201377.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
September 201177.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
September 200977.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
July 200877.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
May 200777.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
April 200677.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
July 200477.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
July 200377.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
July 200277.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10500
June 200277.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
March 200177.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
October 199977.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
September 199877.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
August 199779.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
October 199679.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10500
October 199576.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood10500
October 199491.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10500
October 199391.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10500
October 199291.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10500
July 199191.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good10500