Share:

WB 26th St E over I 35W

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.95551, -93.27021
44°57'20" N, 93°16'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WB 26th St E over I 35W
Structure number:27870
Location:0.9 MI S OF JCT TH 94
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:277.9 ft. [84.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,200 [as of 2007]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.4 tons [63.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$595,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201575.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13200
July 201376.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13200
August 201176.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13200
October 200976.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13200
October 200876.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11800
September 200776.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11800
November 200676.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11800
July 200576.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13700
September 200476.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13700
August 200376.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
November 200177.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory9100
August 200074.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory9100
November 199974.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9100
October 199874.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9100
October 199774.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory11100
January 199774.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory11100
May 199570.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory12500
September 199370.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory13100
October 199270.6Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory13145
December 199170.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory10600