Share:

CSAH 36(UNIV AV) over BNSF RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.97981, -93.23722
44°58'47" N, 93°14'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CSAH 36(UNIV AV) over BNSF RR
Structure number:27A22
Location:0.4 MI SE OF JCT TH 35W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:212.0 ft. [64.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:79.7 ft. [24.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Skew angle:53°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

2010 Inspection 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,501 [as of 2008]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.1 tons [63.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

2000 Inspection 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,400 [as of 1995]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.5 tons [63.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]