US 169 over Mississippi River
Map
Coordinates:
+45.19272, -93.3944645°11'34" N, 93°23'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US 169 over Mississippi River |
| Structure number: | 4380 |
| Location: | At North County Line |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 107.9 ft. [32.9 m] |
| Total length: | 995.1 ft. [303.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 79.7 ft. [24.3 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1929 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Number of main spans: | 10 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 46,000 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 41,000 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 11.4 tons [10.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 83.0 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 32,500 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 6.2 tons [5.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.7 tons [3.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 4.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,248,000 |