Portland Ave over TH 62


+44.89064, -93.26783
44°53'26" N, 93°16'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Portland Ave over TH 62
Structure number:7269
Location:0.4 MI E OF E JCT TH 35W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Total length:152.2 ft. [46.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.3 ft. [19.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,300 [as of 2005]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.5 tons [34.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,107,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201579.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
August 201379.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
August 201178.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
August 201079.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
October 200879.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
August 200779.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
June 200679.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory16300
July 200580.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18400
December 200480.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18400
July 200380.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
December 200178.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
December 200078.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
November 199978.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
May 199878.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
October 199675.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory13200
October 199575.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory13200
October 199474.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory16500
May 199374.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory16500
August 199270.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory15500
July 199170.6Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory15500