CSAH 22(LYNDALE) over MINNEHAHA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+44.90824, -93.2882044°54'30" N, 93°17'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CSAH 22(LYNDALE) over MINNEHAHA CREEK |
| Structure number: | 90444 |
| Location: | 1.4 MI N OF JCT TH35W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Total length: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1892 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 19,272 [as of 2008] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 27.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $583,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,900 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 48.1 tons [43.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.1 tons [29.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,200 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $480,000 |