Share:

CEDAR LAKE RD over BNSF RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.97604, -93.30435
44°58'34" N, 93°18'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CEDAR LAKE RD over BNSF RR
Structure number:90471
Location:0.5 MI SW OF JCT CSAH 40
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:142.1 ft. [43.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.3 ft. [6.5 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:Railroad [27]
Year built:1941
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,080 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:37.3 tons [33.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.7 tons [17.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$615,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201565.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2080
May 201465.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2080
June 201366.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1600
June 201266.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1600
June 201166.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1600
May 201066.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1600
May 200963.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1600
June 200863.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1717
May 200766.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1900
May 200674.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1900
June 200574.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair2000
June 200474.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair2000
May 200374.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair2000
July 200273.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3200
May 200187.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3200
April 200071.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3200
200071.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3200
May 199871.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3200
May 199757.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair2200
July 199657.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair2200
May 199565.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1890
June 199465.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1890
July 199365.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair1890
June 199264.4Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair2385