LAKE NOKOMIS PKWY over MINNEHAHA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+44.91533, -93.2419644°54'55" N, 93°14'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LAKE NOKOMIS PKWY over MINNEHAHA CREEK |
| Structure number: | L5735 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI E OF CEDAR AVE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Total length: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Owner: | Local Park, Forest, or Reservation Agency [12] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,811 [as of 2008] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 50.9 tons [46.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.4 tons [21.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $195,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,800 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 50.6 tons [46.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.3 tons [21.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 52.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,100 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 42.1 tons [38.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $143,000 |