+44.91614, -93.24212
44°54'58" N, 93°14'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:L5736
Location:0.2 MI E OF CEDAR AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Owner:Local Park, Forest, or Reservation Agency [12]
Year built:1923
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:7,800 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.3 tons [21.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$112,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201555.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7800
July 201455.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7800
July 201353.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8409
August 201265.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6971
August 201165.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6971
September 201065.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6971
August 200962.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6971
August 200862.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory6971
July 200764.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8600
August 200664.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8700
July 200564.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8700
July 200464.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8700
September 200364.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8700
September 200265.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7200
September 200165.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7200
August 200063.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7200
200063.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7200
September 199863.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7200
July 199757.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
September 199657.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
August 199563.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7690
September 199463.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7700
September 199363.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7000
September 199263.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair8060