IS 64 E over IS 44, CST TUCKER BLVD,,


+38.61918, -90.18677
38°37'09" N, 90°11'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:IS 64 E over IS 44, CST TUCKER BLVD,,
Structure number:1245
Location:S 23 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:248.0 ft. [75.6 m]
Total length:7847.5 ft. [2391.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:45,039 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:41.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$55,044,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201441.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory45039
July 201241.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory45593
August 20112.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory45593
August 20102.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory46054
August 200924.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory46519
July 200724.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory45873
August 200624.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory45873
July 200524.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory45827
November 200424.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory45463
August 200326.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory45418
October 200124.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory44573