Share:

RP PINE ST TO IS64 over IS 64, TRRA RR, RP IS64E

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.62477, -90.20774
38°37'29" N, 90°12'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RP PINE ST TO IS64 over IS 64, TRRA RR, RP IS64E
Structure number:1263
Old structure number:A1523 2 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 23 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:202.8 ft. [61.8 m]
Total length:1397.0 ft. [425.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:12°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,403 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:18% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$6,667,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 20140.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1403
July 20120.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1359
September 201157.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1409
August 201057.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1423
July 200954.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory5354
July 200854.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory5299
July 200771.6Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory5500
July 200573.7Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory5500
August 200384.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5500
October 200176.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2128
July 199675.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood1520
December 199575.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood1520
February 199475.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood1520
March 199377.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good1520
November 199177.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1520