Share:

DE BALIVIERE BLVD over METROLINK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.64793, -90.28526
38°38'53" N, 90°17'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:DE BALIVIERE BLVD over METROLINK
Structure number:12944
Old structure number:U387525001 115 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 7 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:New structure not yet open to traffic [G]
Average daily traffic:9,050 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:57.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,125,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201557.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9050
April 201357.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9050
March 201157.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9050
April 200957.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair9050
April 200774.9Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair9050
May 200587.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood9050
May 200387.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood9017
August 200187.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood9017
June 199982.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9017
June 199178.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7685