Share:

R. DES PERES DR over CHIPPEWA

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.58624, -90.31398
38°35'10" N, 90°18'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:R. DES PERES DR over CHIPPEWA
Structure number:13488
Old structure number:U387540006 115 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 24 T 45 N R 6 E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:96.1 ft. [29.3 m]
Total length:173.9 ft. [53.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.3 ft. [19.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:14,500 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,266,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201578.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good14500
March 201378.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good14500
March 201178.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good14500
April 200978.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good14500
May 200778.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good14500
April 200578.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good14500
April 200376.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good14000
July 200176.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good14000
June 199979.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good14000
June 199181.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent17000