SPENCER CHURCH LN over SPENCER CR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.38136, -91.5663839°22'53" N, 91°33'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SPENCER CHURCH LN over SPENCER CR |
| Structure number: | 19801 |
| Old structure number: | 2340012 087 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 10 T 53 N R 6 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
| Total length: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 10.8 ft. [3.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1920 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 16.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $326,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 16.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $131,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 26.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $161,000 |