Share:

IS 44 W over CST KINGSHIGHWAY BLVD

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.61851, -90.26649
38°37'07" N, 90°15'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:IS 44 W over CST KINGSHIGHWAY BLVD
Structure number:2063
Location:S 19 T 45 N R 6 E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Total length:174.9 ft. [53.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:68.2 ft. [20.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:44,744 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:51.5 tons [46.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:61.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,246,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201561.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood44744
August 201461.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood45938
August 201359.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood43772
October 201239.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood55195
August 201158.4Not deficientFairFairGood55195
October 201051.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood55753
August 200930.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood56316
August 200837.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood48737
August 200737.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood48555
August 200637.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood48555
August 200557.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood48506
September 200354.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood48073
October 200182.4Not deficientSatisfactoryFairGood47178