Share:

IS 70 W over CST TROOST AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.08664, -94.57008
39°05'12" N, 94°34'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:IS 70 W over CST TROOST AVE
Structure number:219
Location:S 4 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Total length:172.9 ft. [52.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.6 ft. [13.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,129 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:66.3 tons [60.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201570.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood14129
September 201370.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood14129
September 201190.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12527
January 201085.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood35088
January 200881.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood67563
November 200594.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5500
September 200394.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5500
October 200185.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood65623