Share:

RP IS435N TO LANCE over CST RAYTOWN RD

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.05118, -94.49833
39°03'04" N, 94°29'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RP IS435N TO LANCE over CST RAYTOWN RD
Structure number:2458
Location:S 24 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:78.7 ft. [24.0 m]
Total length:168.0 ft. [51.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,046 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:18% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.4 tons [56.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:94.5

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201594.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3046
September 201394.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3046
September 201194.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3085
December 200995.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5500
January 200893.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5500
November 200593.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5000
March 200493.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5000
October 200197.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood4382