PLEASANT VALLY RD over BIG SHOAL CR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.21404, -94.5157339°12'51" N, 94°30'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | PLEASANT VALLY RD over BIG SHOAL CR |
| Structure number: | 25331 |
| Old structure number: | N101B41 024 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 20 T 51 N R 32 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 74.2 ft. [22.6 m] |
| Total length: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,500 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $834,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,100 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 72.9 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,590 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $431,000 |