Share:

N BRIGHTON ST over E FK OF SHOAL CR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.26692, -94.51861
39°16'01" N, 94°31'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:N BRIGHTON ST over E FK OF SHOAL CR
Structure number:25349
Old structure number:N146B11 024 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 5 T 51 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:475 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:58.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201458.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood475
April 201258.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood475
April 201056.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
April 200856.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
January 200656.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
March 200456.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
June 200256.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
July 200056.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood700
May 199848.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood2300
October 199075.8Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good260