+39.28930, -94.64537
39°17'21" N, 94°38'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NE 108TH ST over SECOND CR
Structure number:25356
Old structure number:N189B11 083 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 30 T 52 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,661 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$154,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201471.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1661
April 201271.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1661
March 201072.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1300
March 200872.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1300
January 200672.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1300
March 200472.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1300
June 200272.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1300
May 199873.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood400
October 199065.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory400