NW INTERURBAN RD over WILDCAT BR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.32742, -94.6702239°19'39" N, 94°40'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | NW INTERURBAN RD over WILDCAT BR |
| Structure number: | 25375 |
| Old structure number: | N237B32 083 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 12 T 52 N R 34 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Total length: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.4 ft. [5.6 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1920 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 825 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $390,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 495 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $123,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 72.3 tons [65.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $129,000 |