Share:

CHOUTEAU TFWY over RR YARD

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.12888, -94.52132
39°07'44" N, 94°31'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHOUTEAU TFWY over RR YARD
Structure number:25381
Old structure number:S010B11 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 10 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:295.0 ft. [89.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:15,475 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,007,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201475.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15475
May 201275.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15475
July 201074.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory19800
April 200874.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory19800
February 200673.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory19800
April 200473.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory19800
June 200273.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory19800
June 200074.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory12000
July 199875.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10400
July 199675.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10400
September 199475.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10400
November 199275.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood10400