Share:

LEXINGTON AVE over CHESTNUT TFWY

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.11095, -94.54820
39°06'39" N, 94°32'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LEXINGTON AVE over CHESTNUT TFWY
Structure number:25391
Old structure number:S026B33 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 34 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:386.2 ft. [117.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.7 ft. [13.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1907
Year reconstructed:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:8,474 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:25% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:60.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,617,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201660.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory8474
April 201462.4Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory2000
May 201272.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2000
April 201070.9Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory7000
April 200834.7Structurally deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory7000
February 200671.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair7000
April 200471.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair7000
June 200271.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair7000
July 200072.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1500
July 199872.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair1500
July 199660.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor1500
September 199476.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair1500
November 199276.7Not deficientGoodGoodFair1500