BEARDSLEY RD over HILLSIDE DRAIN
Map
Coordinates:
+39.10000, -94.5866739°06'00" N, 94°35'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BEARDSLEY RD over HILLSIDE DRAIN |
| Structure number: | 25401 |
| Old structure number: | S030B42 048 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 6 T 49 N R 33 W |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 640.1 ft. [195.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.3 ft. [13.2 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1910 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 16 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,500 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 36.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,795,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,356 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Operating rating: | 46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 15.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,186,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,000 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
| Operating rating: | 18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 11.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,608,000 |