Share:

ROCKWELL LN over BRUSH CR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.03701, -94.60096
39°02'13" N, 94°36'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROCKWELL LN over BRUSH CR
Structure number:25432
Old structure number:S078B311 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 30 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:122.1 ft. [37.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,536 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:91.1 tons [82.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:85.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201485.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good2536
April 201285.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good2536
April 201085.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good2670
April 200885.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2670
March 200685.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good2670
March 200480.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3310
June 200280.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodExcellent3310
June 200080.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodExcellent3310
June 199885.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent2320
July 199685.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent2320
March 199585.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent2320