+39.03915, -94.59749
39°02'21" N, 94°35'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:25433
Old structure number:S078B41 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 30 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Total length:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:19,100 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$934,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201665.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair19100
April 201465.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair19100
April 201276.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory19100
April 201078.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19100
June 200878.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19100
March 200678.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19100
March 200478.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19100
June 200278.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory19100
June 200078.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory11968
June 199876.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5800
July 199676.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5800
September 199477.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5800
November 199277.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5800