Share:

J C NICHOLS PKWY over BRUSH CR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.04038, -94.58814
39°02'25" N, 94°35'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:J C NICHOLS PKWY over BRUSH CR
Structure number:25437
Old structure number:U2220S079B33 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 29 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Total length:190.0 ft. [57.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Year reconstructed:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:8,740 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,364,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201468.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair8740
April 201279.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8740
April 201080.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8740
April 200880.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8740
March 200680.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8740
March 200480.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14862
June 200280.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14862
June 200080.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14862
June 199881.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood13062
September 199074.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good19510