BLUE PKWY over CR W OF EASTWOOD T
Map
Coordinates:
+39.02973, -94.5081539°01'47" N, 94°30'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BLUE PKWY over CR W OF EASTWOOD T |
| Structure number: | 25462 |
| Old structure number: | U2220S096B11 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 36 T 49 N R 33 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 31,410 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 33.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $686,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 34,120 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 33.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,212,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 34,710 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 62.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $374,000 |