Share:

WARD PKWY over BRUSH CR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.03324, -94.60586
39°01'60" N, 94°36'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WARD PKWY over BRUSH CR
Structure number:25468
Old structure number:S101B21 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 31 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:21,319 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:66.3 tons [60.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$619,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201679.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21319
April 201479.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21319
April 201279.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21319
April 201079.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22055
June 200879.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22055
March 200679.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22055
March 200479.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22055
June 200279.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22055
June 200078.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22055
July 199877.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26400
June 199677.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26400
September 199478.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26400
November 199276.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26400