+38.42516, -90.68447
38°25'31" N, 90°41'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:28124
Old structure number:0080002 050 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 33 T 43 N R 3 E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Total length:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:351 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:29.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$310,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201529.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory351
February 201358.2Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory50
February 201171.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200971.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200771.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200571.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200371.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood50
February 200171.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood50
January 199971.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
December 199771.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5