IS 70 W over MADISON ST, CST MADISON,
Map
Coordinates:
+39.10694, -94.5944639°06'25" N, 94°35'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | IS 70 W over MADISON ST, CST MADISON, |
| Structure number: | 344 |
| Old structure number: | A 507R1 3 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 6 T 50 N R 34 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over highway and railroad |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 128.3 ft. [39.1 m] |
| Total length: | 4336.2 ft. [1321.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 19° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1960 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1992 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 90 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 34,115 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Operating rating: | 46.2 tons [42.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.6 tons [26.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $20,965,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 31,109 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.2 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25,989 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 12.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $17,978,000 |