Share:

US 169 S over RP LOU HOLLAND DR TO US1

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.13748, -94.58716
39°08'15" N, 94°35'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US 169 S over RP LOU HOLLAND DR TO US1
Structure number:3803
Location:S 14 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:75.5 ft. [23.0 m]
Total length:186.0 ft. [56.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,881 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$821,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201469.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good19881
September 201268.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good20881
December 201072.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17560
June 200872.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17389
January 200772.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good16630
December 200572.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16789
March 200472.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16975
February 200273.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good19707