+39.11684, -94.59065
39°07'01" N, 94°35'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 169 S over CST HARLEM RD
Structure number:3804
Location:S 26 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:83.3 ft. [25.4 m]
Total length:942.0 ft. [287.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Skew angle:21°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,559 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,516,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201651.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood16559
May 201551.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorGood16077
May 201449.1Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood16077
June 201348.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood19568
June 201248.8Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood19222
November 201148.8Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood18845
December 201049.1Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood17560
June 200875.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood17389
January 200776.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16630
December 200575.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16789
March 200475.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16975
February 200275.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19707