US 24 E over KCS RR


+39.10495, -94.49355
39°06'18" N, 94°29'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 24 E over KCS RR
Structure number:6023
Old structure number:K03933 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 31 T 50 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:342.9 ft. [104.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:22°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1934
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:8
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:12,445 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.6 tons [35.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:40.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$4,106,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201540.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12445
April 201340.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair12445
October 201145.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair18542
November 200946.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair17587
January 200846.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair19864
December 200546.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair17768
March 200453.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory18183
October 200150.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory19982
September 199951.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26682
September 199851.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26682
October 199751.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26682
October 199651.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory27390
October 199551.5Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory27390
October 199440.5Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory20403
December 199140.5Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory19766